If you live in the Caribbean or have interests in the region, you’ll know that we’re now past the peak intensity of hurricane season on average. The statistical peak is the 10th of September, and we’re now two weeks past this (on the day this is sent as a newsletter), and the remarkable thing is that, so far, we haven’t experienced much heavy activity with the lead-up to the peak being particularly quiet in the Atlantic. And aside from the major hurricane at the start of the season that devastated several of the Windward islands to the south, it felt like it was an announcement of a very active season, as predicted by the NOAA and other prognostications, the reality has been very different for most of us. So I’m writing this on a Sunday evening as the sun sets to an orange sky with some angry-looking clouds, thinking about how I’m pleased that things have been calm for us so far. But… there’s often a sting in the tail, so I’m not celebrating just yet.

Finally, after a few days of rain, rain, rain, we’re back to no weather alerts for a little respite. The ground is saturated, and any more rain just runs off or causes localised landslides, but so far, nothing too worrying.

Last week, I mentioned that I had been selected for a second time as an ARIN Fellow, although this time, I won’t be travelling; I am attending as a virtual Fellow. I’ve marked my calendar for the two days in October (24th and 25th), and if anyone is interested in Internet Governance, it is a good conference to attend. Even as a visual attendee, ARIN go out of their way to include comments from remote participants.

It might be a short one today, as I am currently writing this amid a fairly heavy tropical wave passing over us. Heavy rains, lots of thunder and lightning, a breaker tripping every few minutes, oh, and a UPS battery failure are making my morning a little more difficult than it normally is. It’ll pass, but in the meantime, I will try to get this written and out the door before the end of the day. Bear with me. If you’re reading this email on Tuesday, I guess I got it done. 😀

😱 It’s already September! I’m not entirely sure where the earlier part of the year went. A lot of things happened in the news, but many events also made for a busy period for me up until now. Spoiler: it doesn’t look like it’ll be any calmer, either!

I wanted to get back to some of the thinking I have been doing about governance and the open web. I mentioned a project last week from a team that decided to look into Fediverse governance and offer a guide to setting up and operating Social Web services by looking at the technology, moderation, legal risks and other topics important to good governance. The document is long, and I still haven’t had time to read it all, so I’ll refrain from providing an AI summary, as I doubt it could capture some of the subtleties of such a document. I hope to have time this week, but it depends on other project deadlines.

Good morning from a frighteningly quiet Caribbean in terms of hurricane activity. Looking at the previsions, that is about to change over the coming week or two as we head into the statistically peak hurricane activity period.

Here on the internet, there are no seasons, just waves and waves and never-ending waves of innovation, development, and more. For me, three interesting developments on the web merit a little discussion and sharing. One is about the name of the Fediverse—something that is presently misunderstood, too technical, too “techie.” The second is about the governance of such systems, given their federated and distributed nature, and the third is about the inclusion/exclusion of the current tech giants from the Social Web.

Unless you’ve not been reading, you’ll have noticed that I have been a bit down on “tech” lately. And it’s true: I do feel a sense of despair when I look at the tech industry from a macro perspective, or at least from the perspective of the numerous articles, blogs, and reports discussing the latest dreadful thing tech has enabled.

Last week was no different, with no less than Apple starting to show colours that it never used to. The TLDR is that Apple has been battling with the EU about its App Store policies related to the fees Apple charges. Not the amount of the fees, although that too, is up for debate, the anti-steering fees, a “Core Technology Fee”, and most egregiously, a fee to anyone and everyone that graces their presence by using an Apple product. Apple decided that —during a period in which it has been widely criticised for its tone-deaf advert for the latest iPad in which it crushed the tools of the creative industry, irking many people in that industry to feel more than a little concerned about how Apple now treats this industry compared to its historical stance for the creative arts— it should bully Patreon into taking a cut from all its users whether they use Apple services, software and hardware or not, purely because that used an in-app purchase on the Patreon app. Of course, Patreon could not use Apple’s in-app purchasing system, but no. Apple closed that door too, even going as far as to threaten to kick the Patreon app out of the App Store if they didn’t switch payment processors to Apple’s own. Then it transpired that the rates Patreon charges its users are lower than those of Apple, which is mafia-ing out of people. To remind you, Apple takes a 30% cut in the first year, and if you can qualify for the Small Business Program (if), that is reduced to 15% for each transaction. So now, Patreon users pay Apple the biggest slice of their earnings for little to no actual service rendered, over and above the service actually rendered by Patreon. This has a name, and it is called rent-seeking. This is a feudal economy and brings us back to medieval times when lords of the manor trashed the commoner’s rights to extract more and more money to gain and sustain wealth. This will not end well for Apple.

We’re getting into the main activity of hurricane season, and things are starting to liven up. There is activity a little less than halfway between the islands and the Cabo Verde islands, which looks favourable to develop into something to watch out for over the next couple of days or so. This is a season I have not been looking forward to for several months.

My week has been filled with working on an upcoming project; although I am behind in what I promised to do, I’m sure I’ll catch up and work on finalising a couple of projects in my new role. I’m encountering organisations with basic digitalisation needs that are not being met by the offer in the market. For example, I’m seeing companies being demoed and offered expensive and sophisticated software to do document management when, in fact, what they need is a simple solution that works the way they work, not the other way around. It reminds me of when SAP started to gain a foothold in large organisations, forcing them to completely change their way of working to be ‘compatible’ with SAP. Sometimes with disastrous results for the company. I feel we’re experiencing a similar situation with the tools on offer. SMSEs in the Caribbean can not afford either the upfront costs, the ongoing development and integration costs or the training budgets required to integrate these tools; they are primarily concerned with turning a profit or just maintaining a turnover. If you work as a reseller, integrator or consultant in the Caribbean, it might be worthwhile evaluating the ‘real’ needs of your clients versus your offering and seeing if there is indeed a gap. There’s an opportunity out there!

Good morning from a very wet eastern Caribbean as I write this on a Monday morning in my office.

Last week was full of tying up outstanding things and preparing for the later part of the year. Yes, it really did pass that quickly!

I wanted to share a few real-world issues for those embarking on or already on the Digital Transformation journey. Off the bat, you know I don’t like the term Digital Transformation at all, but I am constrained to use it for the time being or until I come up with a better description that is accepted by the world.

I want to start this edition with a little apology. Last week, on Tuesday, you would have received an email from the newsletter list that I have been running on and off for a few years now in a different format than I have been doing previously. This was a test to see how the newsletter platform would operate and also to get something more regularly out of the drafts folder and into mailboxes. I hope you don’t mind.

It would be an understatement to say that last week was a quiet news week. I’m not going to get political here, although I do have my views that I would be happy to discuss on a one-to-one basis, but I will say that I’m especially interested in the tech angle and how tech is a much bigger part of political and social discourse. And being a bigger part of that automatically means that it has a much bigger responsibility. Not that the current crop of tech bros would have you believe, they’re still childishly trying “move fast and break things”. A most immature method of actually innovating and effecting positive change. Their philosophy pays absolutely no mind or weights the risk of what actually “break things” means. We have observed that it can absolutely mean, genocide, murder, rape (virtual and irl), CSAM and the very possibility of a breakdown in democracy. Now you might think I’m being hyperbolic and that’s fine. But there are very real symptoms, incidents, factual evidence that points to this conclusion. The links above only hint at the amount of research, news related to these subjects. It is clear that a lot of it is as a result of the now infamous “Big Tech” world playing fast and loose with the world. I don’t have answers or solutions to this, as the wealth amassed by this crop of people is beyond anything we have seen before, and used skilfully that wealth will absolutely corrupt almost all but the very strong-willed with morals of Graphene.